« UNICEF's New Handbook Fights Child Violence? | Main | Chinagate, China Today »

May 03, 2007

Breaking: Did YouTube Censor Michelle Malkin?

**UPDATED**

 

Michelle Malkin’s latest HotAir installment on YouTube about Verizon-backed rapper and child molester Akon for his vicious assault of a 15 year old girl on stage has disappeared. At present there appears to be no word from Malkin, but it seems unlikely she would have deleted that post covering a story that as of lunchtime today was a “story gaining steam”, according to Malkin’s HotAir website.

 

In fact, HotAir still has a link to the YouTube video, which now leads to the message: "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Universal Music Group". Not likely a copyright violation though kids: neither the song in the concert nor any other songs in the video were played in full and were in fact used to illustrate a point – all covered by Fair Use.

 

 

Given Google-YouTube’s history of Chinese-style censorship, it seems something rather other is at play here. Something rather rotten and coming straight out of Denmark.

 

 

UPDATE: Malkin fires back

 

Michelle also links to a great FAQ about DMCA "Safe Harbor" Provisions

 

WorldNet Daily: Big Corporations Help "Rape Rapper" Tour U.S.

 

 

 

BLOGBAT RELATED:

Digging for Hidden Pirates (02 May 2007)

How Far Does Fair Use Go? (03 February 2006)

 

 

 

Posted by Martin at May 3, 2007 03:19 PM

Comments

Actually you don't need to have the full song to have a copywright infringement. Ask Vanilla Ice, or any other artist who has ever used a sample how much of a song is needed for copywright infringement.

Posted by: Evan at May 3, 2007 04:52 PM

Thanks for commenting and offering your insight, Evan.

From my perspective, I think the overriding question was for what purpose content was used. The fact that only portions of the performance(s) were used which were germane to the discussion would seem to further support the idea that those clips were used because they were necessary for conveying a point about the artist, rather than in the creation of related art without consent.

To label Malkin's YouTube post as a copyright infringement one must also say that the AP could not print photos snapped of a collapsed bleacher during the Super Bowl without the NFL's consent.

That Akon has become a human train wreck is his own fault, not that of those who simply wish to report it. Akon has done something far outside the scope of his music, and as such, he has become a legitimate story, as have the lyrics that seem to convey a value system no doubt largely responsible for his behavior, as has the video of his assault of the child. I would suspect if he faces prosecution, those lyrics and may well be used along with that video as evidence against him.

Posted by: Martin at May 3, 2007 05:18 PM

thanks so much Martin for sharing this story..the Truth needs to be told..even if he is Musssssslim!

Posted by: Angel at May 5, 2007 08:50 PM