Blogbat

« Blogbat: The News Before You Knew It | Main | On China and the Americas »

June 09, 2007

Border Anarchists

You need to see this

 

 

I sincerely apologize for the language on the following two videos ahead of time; however, I believe it is critically important that as many people as possible watch them so that they might be hardened in their resolve to defeat the big-business border-anarchists and the Balkanizing special interests they keep on their leash.

 

 

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING VIDEOS CONTAIN VERY STRONG LANGUAGE

 

 

 

 

Videos courtesy of Ninnaum

 

 

In the second video you'll note that pro-border anarchy supporters attempt to intimidate a patriotic pro-borders Hispanic American, directing at her an endless stream of the most personal and abusive language (abusive language Americans don't want to use). This, as many of us already know, is not an isolated incident; there are millions of Americans of Hispanic descent who are losing jobs, their tranquil neighborhoods, and their peace and safety to such as witnessed above. The masked thugs in the first video above and those who would so horrifically verbally assault a woman are the people President Bush, Ted Kennedy, and Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison want to be here to desecrate the flags Americans don't want to desecrate. I say this specifically because these miscreants most likely each to the man have criminal histories, be they gang members, sex offenders, home invaders, drunk drivers, vandals, defrauders. Yet, even if they didn't, they clearly view themselves as invaders, not immigrants; as scofflaws and foreign insurgents, not those seeking to build a better United States.

 

The defeat of the Cornyn amendment in the Senate which would have excluded from the opportunity to gain a visa anyone who has a criminal record tells you everything you need to know about the supporters of the bill sans amendment: they must hate America. Yes, this is strong language, too, but I use it quite deliberately. If they loved America, they would take the time to know what America needs and wants on such a crucial, passionate, life and death issue, and they would respond accordingly. The fact that such politicians do not seem to care enough to know, or in fact do know but act diametrically seems only to offer such an explanation, regretfully. Such a thing is analogous to a husband whose wife is pinned under a fallen tree and either chooses to ignore the reality of what will happen if he does not remove the tree or chooses to chop another one down on top of her. In such a case one would say that he clearly hates his wife (among other choice expressions).

 

There's little doubt however that Republicans will be choosing a law enforcement, security, and order president in 2008. However, any candidate from either party that responds to the just and moral outrage of the betrayal of the American trust will do very well. I suppose therefore we can at least thank President Bush for wiping out voter apathy in our time.

 

It's good to pay attention to history. While Jimmy Carter outraged the American people by giving away the strategically important Panama Canal (which is now controlled by Communist China and could be used to hide medium range ballistic missiles and export instability in the region – including right here at home), George W. Bush is trying to give away the United States itself, which is one reason why Newt Gingrich and I among others have so effortlessly been able to reveal the obvious similarities between the two men.

 

Bear in mind that the Senate bill is not completely dead, it is only dormant, waiting for public apathy to return to what it was. Therefore, it’s vital that we take the offensive now and proactively push for legislation that protects Americans, is fair to immigrants already legally going through the process and even fair to those who came here illegally, realize they screwed up, and sincerely wish to work honestly and fairly at noncompetitive jobs (and who have a right to a humane wage if they do stay). Such a forward-looking bill would divide those who should stay from those who must go through thorough background checks (with identities that check out in their home countries) and vigorous enforcement that includes the fence. I’m not a fan of Bill O’Reilly by any stretch, but if they can make Mr. Ed appear to talk, Bill O’Reilly can sometimes be right. Here is his “one-page” four-point proposal:

 

There are just four components. One, secure the southern border with 700, not 300 miles of barrier, double the border patrol and back them up with 10,000 National Guards people. That would effectively shut down human and drug smuggling from Mexico.

 

Two, require all illegal aliens in the country right now to register at the post office with Homeland Security. After registering, they would be given a tamper proof ID card, designating their status and their right to work temporarily in the USA. If the illegal aliens do not register, it's a criminal felony. Right now sneaking across the border is a civil action. Remember that. Subjecting the person to immediate deportation or jail time. The criminal penalty goes way up.

 

Three, any business that hires an illegal worker who doesn't have a tamper proof ID card faces draconian fines and possible prison time for the executives.

 

And four, each illegal alien would have his case reviewed by federal authorities. And they would decide who would receive a Z-visa to stay and who would not. That takes the blanket amnesty, something many American hate, off the table. It also allows the Feds to make rational decisions about who's helping America and who isn't.

 

Under that banner, no illegal alien who commits a crime while here would be allowed to stay. Also under that program, no welfare of any kind would be paid to folks here illegally. They have to work for their living.

 

Now that is a fair immigration plan that I believe would be acceptable to most Americans. It would also allow the Feds to quickly build a database, so Homeland Security would know the extent of the alien intrusion, which we don't know now. Again, any illegal alien who didn't cooperate with the new law would immediately become an outlaw. And immediate action could be taken against that non-citizen who doesn't comply. That would end the sanctuary city madness and give the federal government more tools to regain control over this out of control situation. (Transcript: O’Reilly Factor “Impact Segment”, 8 June 2007, via LexisNexis)

 

 

Later O’Reilly interviewed Texas Senator John Cornyn, who seemed to agree such components would be a much better start in the right direction. Certainly we cannot suffer the destruction of our country and the civil society Americans and productive immigrants have worked for hundreds of years to create for their and our posterity. To wit, I think Newt says it best when he says that Americans must remain true to their tradition and refuse to bow to realities created for the convenience of those striving for things other than America's best interest:

 

 

 

RELATED:

Another Border Patrol Agent Headed to Prison (Right Truth)

JFK Terror Plot Thickens (Right Truth)

A History of Empty Words, Claims on Immigration (George Will)

Get in Line, Einstein (Charles Krauthammer)

Illegal Alien Myths (2006) (Heather MacDonald)

Poll (June 2007): Most Americans Want Burder Enforcement First

Poll (June 2007): 23% of Americans Back Senate Bill (Rasmussen c/o Wake up America) (Thought: I wonder how much of that 23% correlates with the 23% approval rating congress currently holds.)

 

Posted by Martin at June 9, 2007 03:04 PM

Comments

Posted by: Debbie at June 9, 2007 09:51 PM